PDA

View Full Version : losing the "war on terror"


a.k.a.
04-19-2005, 08:54 AM
Of course it’s never been about making the world a safer place, but just for the record...

Bush administration eliminating 19-year-old international terrorism report

By Jonathan S. Landay

Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - The State Department decided to stop publishing an annual report on international terrorism after the government's top terrorism center concluded that there were more terrorist attacks in 2004 than in any year since 1985, the first year the publication covered.

Several U.S. officials defended the abrupt decision, saying the methodology the National Counterterrorism Center used to generate statistics for the report may have been faulty, such as the inclusion of incidents that may not have been terrorism.

Last year, the number of incidents in 2003 was undercounted, forcing a revision of the report, "Patterns of Global Terrorism."

But other current and former officials charged that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's office ordered "Patterns of Global Terrorism" eliminated several weeks ago because the 2004 statistics raised disturbing questions about the Bush's administration's frequent claims of progress in the war against terrorism.

"Instead of dealing with the facts and dealing with them in an intelligent fashion, they try to hide their facts from the American public," charged Larry C. Johnson, a former CIA analyst and State Department terrorism expert who first disclosed the decision to eliminate the report in The Counterterrorism Blog, an online journal.

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., who was among the leading critics of last year's mix-up, reacted angrily to the decision.

"This is the definitive report on the incidence of terrorism around the world. It should be unthinkable that there would be an effort to withhold it - or any of the key data - from the public. The Bush administration should stop playing politics with this critical report."

A senior State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue, confirmed that the publication was being eliminated, but said the allegation that it was being done for political reasons was "categorically untrue."

According to Johnson and U.S. intelligence officials familiar with the issue, statistics that the National Counterterrorism Center provided to the State Department reported 625 "significant" terrorist attacks in 2004.

That compared with 175 such incidents in 2003, the highest number in two decades.

The statistics didn't include attacks on American troops in Iraq, which President Bush as recently as Tuesday called "a central front in the war on terror."

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/11407689.htm

a.k.a.
04-19-2005, 09:44 AM
OK. My mistake. The report WILL be published by the state department, but annual statistics on terrorism activities will be included in some other report. (???)

“WASHINGTON -- The United States state department said on Monday it will stop publishing annual statistics on terrorism activities after discrepancies were found last year in figures for the number of attacks and casualties.

Department spokesperson Richard Boucher said "the government has decided that the National Counterterrorism Centre should compile and publish the statistical data on terrorism that has previously been included by the state department in our report."

But he dismissed news reports that the department would do away with its annual Patterns of Global Terrorism report, which is mandated by law.

"That report is due to Congress by April 30, and we will do that this year," Boucher said, adding that the publication would contain, as it had in the past, the country reports on terrorism.

"That's what the law asks of the state department, that's what we'll be reporting to Congress," he said. “

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0419-10.htm

Guess I'll have to wait and see what all this really means.

DrSmellThis
04-19-2005, 02:22 PM
So they're marginalizing the report rather than eliminating it? Suppressing information and critical opinions regarding terrorism and war is the MO of this administration, in any case.

625 in 2004 vs. a previous high of 175 in 2003, not counting attacks against troops in Iraq? -- a truly remarkable failure!

belgareth
04-19-2005, 03:09 PM
Are you really surprised? From the terrorist's point of view, we are the enemy. Especially in Iraq. Can you blame them for calling us invaders? What would you be doing if you felt your country was being invaded? Right or wrong in our eyes, you can't expect them to not fight back. If I were in their shoes I would be doing much the sme thing.

Mtnjim
04-19-2005, 04:27 PM
The "War on Terror" and the "War on Drugs" are simply being used as tools of control and expediency by the past few administrations. If a few innocent Blacks in the inner cities or Iraqis are injured, killed or have their lives destroyed, so what as long as the administration gets the control it wants. Neither of these "wars" will ever be won; it would put people out of work and take away funding and control.

belgareth
04-19-2005, 04:55 PM
No argument here.

Your tax dollars at work serving your best interests...right?

And people wonder why I don't trust ANY administration or portion of our government..

satyrboy
04-19-2005, 06:53 PM
Bel,
are you a libertarian?

belgareth
04-19-2005, 07:02 PM
Not really. Most of their candidates are better than any mainstream but there are parts of their philosophy I cannot accept. I have a strong dislike for party politics in general. Most of my mistrust of our government has come from watching us get lied to and cheated, time and again. I wonder at others who blithley continue to believe that minor changes will fix the massive problems. It's kind of like trimming somebody's toenails while they are in cardiac arrest.