Close

Results 1 to 30 of 37

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Moderator Mtnjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    SAN DIEGO
    Posts
    2,481
    Rep Power
    8384

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rbt View Post
    "A government by

    the people, for the people and of the people..."


    Oh well...
    Sorry, over the past 30 years it's

    become a government by the corporations, for the corporations, and of the corporations.

    Especially Wall

    Street and the huge banks.
    Freedom begins when you tell Mrs. Grundy to go fly a kite.
    --Lazarus Long

  2. #2
    Moderator belgareth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Lower Slovobia
    Posts
    7,961
    Rep Power
    8566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mtnjim View Post
    Sorry,

    over the past 30 years it's become a government by the corporations, for the corporations, and of the

    corporations.

    Especially Wall Street and the huge banks.
    That's somewhat true. However, those

    corporations also provide jobs. I also believe both parties are responsible for the percieved problems with

    corporations. Neither party is guilt free.
    To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.

    Thomas Jefferson

  3. #3
    Moderator idesign's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Middle Kingdom
    Posts
    2,400
    Rep Power
    6433

    Default

    And now, the play is hard toward

    government. By the Left, of the Left, for the Left.

    I think we should make Obamacare supporters give up their

    private health care, sign up for Medicare under a special provision, and send in their insurance premiums plus an

    extra 20% tax to "reduce costs". This is essentially what they're proposing. Let's call it the

    Barack-Kennedy Reid and Pelosi Plan, or B-KRaP.

    If that little experiment works, we'll know they were right.

    If not, the only ones who suffer had it coming.

    Its interesting that Kennedy's "lifelong goal" was universal

    healthcare, and now its overwhelming unpopularity may (hopefully) be instrumental in giving his old Senate seat to

    the first Republican in 30 years, and eliminate the Dems super-majority in the Senate, and possibly derail

    Obamacare. Poetic justice if it happens that way.


  4. #4
    Moderator Mtnjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    SAN DIEGO
    Posts
    2,481
    Rep Power
    8384

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by belgareth View Post
    ...I also

    believe both parties are responsible for the percieved problems with corporations. Neither party is guilt

    free.
    Absolutely!!
    Freedom begins when you tell Mrs. Grundy to go fly a kite.
    --Lazarus Long

  5. #5
    Moderator belgareth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Lower Slovobia
    Posts
    7,961
    Rep Power
    8566

    Default

    Well, the good news is that

    Kennedy's seat went to Brown. That breaks the democratic super majority. I suspect regardless of when they swear

    Brown in, the health care bill is DOA.

    A very liberal state voting in a republican is a sure message from

    voters. The message being that we are fed up and their jobs are at stake.
    To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.

    Thomas Jefferson

  6. #6
    Moderator idesign's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Middle Kingdom
    Posts
    2,400
    Rep Power
    6433

    Default

    The handwriting on the wall will

    be how the Dems handle their reaction to Brown's win. Push back with dirty tricks and there might be a revolution.

    Back off, and they'll lose fewer seats in November.

    Interesting Mass. demographic: It stacks up with I think

    around 36% Dem, 12% Rep, with the rest being Independent, or whatever that state's word for them. Brown had to

    take almost all Independent voters to win, and this is a State which BO took by 26 points.

    Obama has not even

    made his first state of the union address, and his constituency has fallen apart.


  7. #7
    Phero Guru Rbt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Midwest US
    Posts
    1,579
    Rep Power
    7246

    Default

    Just as an aside, I'd like to

    express one opinion.

    There is a difference between "Health Insurance" and a "Health Plan." Too often these two

    items are lumped together.

    Health Insurance is for *unexpected catastrophic accident or illness* IMO.

    A

    Health Plan is day to day wellness care. Prescriptions, doctor visits, etc.

    Where I think one problem is, is

    that they tried to do it all at once, in one swell foop. Not a good idea. If they'd stuck to one or the other, kept

    it simple (and understandable) they may have had better success. And if they had set things up to phase in over

    time, slowly, step by step, everyone could see where things were going, where the problems were, what *needed* to be

    done next. If anything really needed to be done at all.

    The health care in this country does suck. It needs

    help. But they're approaching it like the politicians they are. People so out of touch with the *real* "average

    American" it's scary. We need a better way to do things, but at this rate, it'll never happen, at least in my

    lifetime. Not sure if that is good or bad...
    Last edited by Rbt; 01-21-2010 at 05:22 PM.
    The opposite of love isn't hate.
    It's apathy
    .

  8. #8
    Moderator belgareth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Lower Slovobia
    Posts
    7,961
    Rep Power
    8566

    Default

    Your right, they are completely

    out of touch. They also think our pockets are bottomless. If they would stop trying to find ways to reach deeper

    into them and do things to improve the employment picture, things would be better.

    That's very generalized, I

    agree. NAFTA, excessive regulation and taxation drove many companies offshore. They need to be attracted back to the

    US by providing a climate where they can earn a profit while paying a decent wage. Punishing the large corporations

    for being large corporations is self destructive. Entice well paying jobs back to the US and many things will

    improve right away, including the ability of millions to afford health care.

    Taxation is a problem at the

    individual level as well. The government does not create jobs, consumerism creates jobs. Every dollar the government

    takes is that much less for the economy and it is strangling our ability to compete on the world stage. Look at even

    something as small as my business. A 35% reduction in my tax burden would allow me to hire another person, that

    would be a salesperson. Because other companies would also have more money they would also be hiring and buying

    technology services from people like me. In the end, it would mean more products bought and sold and more people put

    to work. Tax revenue would actually increase!

    Not that I think the government needs more money. In reality, our

    government has become too large and sucks too much money for entitlement programs both at the individual level and

    the corporate level. I do not believe any business should be bailed out. Let them fail. It may hurt on the short

    term but the well run companies would be that much stronger in the long term. It also would reduce our tax burden,

    putting more money into the economy. People should not believe they have a right to indefinate support. They need to

    realize it is a helping hand to get them back on their feet. And it should only come with requirements for job

    training and hunting.

    All that would lower unemployment and contribute to the ability of more people to pay

    their own way. Then we can talk about who really needs help and who doesn't. It takes too long, right? Wrong! The

    democrats were going to start taxing us right away, which would have slowed the economy more, but not provide

    services for several years. My way would not add taxes, which would reduce jobs, it would increase jobs by cutting

    taxes. The time we could start providing medical services would come a lot sooner and be better funded.

    I don't

    believe the government should be in control of our health care, they have demonstrated their incompetence too many

    times already. That's another detail to work out later.
    To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.

    Thomas Jefferson

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •