</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
proteus, since your using wagg, would you thus see yourself as an alpha-male type of person, as wagg is supposed to be good for such people. , youve made me think again about wagg cos some girls were a bit intimidated by me when i had npa,soe,ae on

<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">

Well, I\'m definitely an alpha-male, but in a quiet way (don\'t like to make waves, be loud etc) and achieve what I want this way, and generally find myself in leadership roles whether in high school, college or work. I know I intimidate a lot of people initially, both male and female [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img], as I\'ve been told this, that I look very unapproachable, aloof, stuck-up etc. but when folks get to know me they usually find I\'m pretty down to earth and friendly enough [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]. But this is why I usually will go with the -nol products at work in particular as it makes my job easier as I deal many different people all day so it helps to have them feel relaxed around you.

But the interesting thing is some of the -none products work very well for me like AE, JB#1 and NPA, which is suprising as I\'d have thought it would just make me even more intimidating. But these work for some reason whereas PPA for example I\'ve had nothing but really bad reactions with.

As for whether WAGG soothes the effect of -none, I have no idea as I haven\'t tested it with a -none product but it seems logical to assume that if it reduces the \"intimidation factor\" it must offset endogenous -none in some way.