I Think You're Fat
This story is about something
called Radical Honesty. It may change your life. (But honestly, we don't really care.)
By A.J.
Jacobs
7/24/2007
Here's the truth about why I'm writing this article:
I want to fulfill my
contract with my boss. I want to avoid getting fired. I want all the attractive women I knew in high school and
college to read it. I want them to be amazed and impressed and feel a vague regret over their decision not to have
sex with me, and maybe if I get divorced or become a widower, I can have sex with them someday at a reunion. I want
Hollywood to buy my article and turn it into a movie, even though they kind of already made the movie ten years ago
with Jim Carrey. I want to get congratulatory e-mails and job offers that I can politely decline. Or accept if
they're really good. Then get a generous counteroffer from my boss.
To be totally honest, I was sorry I
mentioned this idea to my boss about three seconds after I opened my mouth. Because I knew the article would be a
pain in the ### to pull off. Dammit. I should have let my colleague Tom Chiarella write it. But I didn't want to
seem lazy.
What I mentioned to my boss was this: a movement called Radical Honesty.
The movement was
founded by a sixty-six-year-old Virginia-based psychotherapist named Brad Blanton. He says everybody would be
happier if we just stopped lying. Tell the truth, all the time. This would be radical enough -- a world without fibs
-- but Blanton goes further. He says we should toss out the filters between our brains and our mouths. If you think
it, say it. Confess to your boss your secret plans to start your own company. If you're having fantasies about your
wife's sister, Blanton says to tell your wife and tell her sister. It's the only path to authentic relationships.
It's the only way to smash through modernity's soul-deadening alienation. Oversharing? No such thing.
Yes.
I know. One of the most idiotic ideas ever, right up there with Vanilla Coke and giving Phil Spector a gun permit.
Deceit makes our world go round. Without lies, marriages would crumble, workers would be fired, egos would be
shattered, governments would collapse.
And yet...maybe there's something to it. Especially for me. I have a
lying problem. Mine aren't big lies. They aren't lies like "I cannot recall that crucial meeting from two months
ago, Senator." Mine are little lies. White lies. Half-truths. The kind we all tell. But I tell dozens of them every
day. "Yes, let's definitely get together soon." "I'd love to, but I have a touch of the stomach flu." "No, we
can't buy a toy today -- the toy store is closed." It's bad. Maybe a couple of weeks of truth-immersion therapy
would do me good.
I e-mail Blanton to ask if I can come down to Virginia and get some pointers before
embarking on my Radical Honesty experiment. He writes back: "I appreciate you for apparently having a real interest
and hope you're not just doing a cutesy little superficial dip#### job like most journalists."
I'm already
nervous. I better start off with a clean slate. I confess I lied to him in my first e-mail -- that I haven't
ordered all his books on Amazon yet. I was just trying to impress upon him that I was serious about his work. He
writes back: "Thanks for your honesty in attempting to guess what your manipulative and self-protective motive must
have been."
Blanton lives in a house he built himself, perched on a hill in the town of Stanley, Virginia,
population 1,331. We're sitting on white chairs in a room with enormous windows and a crackling fireplace. He's
swirling a glass of Maker's Mark bourbon and water and telling me why it's important to live with no
lies.
"You'll have really bad times, you'll have really great times, but you'll contribute to other people
because you haven't been dancing on eggshells your whole ####### life. It's a better life."
"Do you think
it's ever okay to lie?" I ask.
"I advocate never lying in personal relationships. But if you have Anne Frank
in your attic and a Nazi knocks on the door, lie....I lie to any government official." (Blanton's politics are just
this side of Noam Chomsky's.) "I lie to the IRS. I always take more deductions than are justified. I lie in golf.
And in poker."
Blanton adjusts his crotch. I expected him to be a bully. Or maybe a new-age huckster with a
bead necklace who sits cross-legged on the floor. He's neither. He's a former Texan with a big belly and a big
laugh and a big voice. He's got a bushy head of gray hair and a twang that makes his bye sound like bah. He calls
himself "white trash with a Ph.D." If you mixed DNA from Lyndon Johnson, Ken Kesey, and threw in the nonannoying
parts of Dr. Phil, you might get Blanton.
He ran for Congress twice, with the novel promise that he'd be an
honest politician. In 2004, he got a surprising 25 percent of the vote in his Virginia district as an independent.
In 2006, the Democrats considered endorsing him but got skittish about his weeklong workshops, which involve a day
of total nudity. They also weren't crazy that he's been married five times (currently to a Swedish flight
attendant twenty-six years his junior). He ran again but withdrew when it became clear he was going to be
crushed.
My interview with Blanton is unlike any other I've had in fifteen years as a journalist. Usually,
there's a fair amount of ### kissing and diplomacy. You approach the controversial stuff on tippy toes (the way
Barbara Walters once asked Richard Gere about that terrible, terrible rumor). With Blanton, I can say anything that
pops into my mind. In fact, it would be rude not to say it. I'd be insulting his life's work. It's my first taste
of Radical Honesty, and it's liberating, exhilarating.
When Blanton rambles on about President Bush, I say,
"You know, I stopped listening about a minute ago."
"Thanks for telling me," he says.
I tell him, "You
look older than you do in the author photo for your book," and when he veers too far into therapyspeak, I say, "That
just sounds like gobbledy####."
"Thanks," he replies." Or, "That's fine."
Blanton has a temper -- he
threatened to "beat the ####" out of a newspaper editor during the campaign -- but it hasn't flared tonight. The
closest he comes to attacking me is when he says I am self-indulgent and Esquire is pretentious. Both
true.
Blanton pours himself another bourbon and water. He's got a wad of chewing tobacco in his cheek, and
when he spits into the fireplace, the flames crackle louder.
"My boss says you sound like a ####," I
say.
"Tell your boss he's a ####," he says.
"I'm glad you picked your nose just now," I say.
"Because it was funny and disgusting, and it'll make a good detail for the article."
"That's fine. I'll
pick my ### in a minute." Then he unleashes his deep Texan laugh: heh, heh, heh. (He also burps and farts throughout
our conversation; he believes the one-cheek sneak is "a little deceitful.")
No topic is off-limits. "I've
slept with more than five hundred women and about a half dozen men," he tells me. "I've had a whole bunch of
threesomes" -- one of which involved a hermaphrodite prostitute equipped with dual organs.
What about
animals?
Blanton thinks for a minute. "I let my dog lick my #### once."
If he hadn't devoted his life
to Radical Honesty, I'd say he was, to use his own phrase, as full of #### as a Christmas turkey. But I don't
think he is. I believe he's telling the truth. Which is a startling thing for a journalist to confront. Generally,
I'm devoting 30 percent of my mental energy to figuring out what a source is lying about or hiding from me. Another
20 percent goes into scheming about how to unearth that buried truth. No need for that today.
"I was
disappointed when I visited your office," I tell Blanton. (Earlier he had shown me a small, cluttered single-room
office that serves as the Radical Honesty headquarters.) "I'm impressed by exteriors, so I would have been
impressed by an office building in some city, not a room in Butt ####, Virginia. For my article, I want this to be a
legitimate movement, not a fringe movement."
"What about a legitimate fringe movement?" asks Blanton, who
has, by this time, had three bourbons.
Blanton's legitimate fringe movement is sizable but not huge. He's
sold 175,000 books in eleven languages and has twenty-five trainers assisting in workshops and running practice
groups around the country.
Now, my editor thinks I'm overreaching here and trying too hard to justify this
article's existence, but I think society is speeding toward its own version of Radical Honesty. The truth of our
lives is increasingly being exposed, both voluntarily (MySpace pages, transparent business transactions) and
involuntarily. (See Gonzales and Google, or ask Alec Baldwin.) For better or worse, we may all soon be Brad
Blantons. I need to be prepared. [Such bull####. -- Ed.]
I return to New York and immediately set about
delaying my experiment. When you're with Blanton, you think, Yes, I can do this! The truth, the whole truth,
nothing but the truth. But when I get back to bosses and fragile friendships, I continue my lying
ways.
"How's Radical Honesty going?" my boss asks.
"It's okay," I lie. "A little slow."
A
couple of weeks later, I finally get some inspiration from my friend's five-year-old daughter, Alison. We are in
Central Park for a play date. Out of nowhere, Alison looks at me evenly and says, "Your teeth are yellow because you
drink coffee all day."
Damn. Now that's some radical honesty for you. Maybe I should be more like a
five-year-old. An hour later, she shows me her new pet bug -- a beetle of some sort that she has in her cupped
hands.
"It's napping," she whispers.
I nudge the insect with my finger. It doesn't move. Should I
play along? No. I should tell her the truth, like she told me about my teeth.
"It's not napping."
She
looks confused.
"It's dead."
Alison runs to her father, dismayed. "Daddy, he just said a bad
word."
I feel like an #######. I frightened a five-year-old, probably out of revenge for an insult about my
oral hygiene. I postpone again -- for a few more weeks. And then my boss tells me he needs the article for the July
issue.
I start in again at dinner with my friend Brian. We are talking about his new living situation, and I
decide to tell him the truth.
"You know, I forget your fiancée's name."
This is highly unacceptable
-- they've been together for years; I've met her several times.
"It's Jenny."
In his book, Blanton
talks about the thrill of total candor, the Space Mountain-worthy adrenaline rush you get from breaking taboos. As
he writes, "You learn to like the excitement of mild, ongoing risk taking." This I felt.
Luckily, Brian
doesn't seem too pissed. So I decide to push my luck. "Yes, that's right. Jenny. Well, I resent you for not
inviting me to you and Jenny's wedding. I don't want to go, since it's in Vermont, but I wanted to be
invited."
"Well, I resent you for not being invited to your wedding."
"You weren't invited? Really? I
thought I had."
"Nope."
"Sorry, man. That was a mistake."
A breakthrough! We are communicating!
Blanton is right. Brian and I crushed some eggshells. We are not stoic, emotionless men. I'm enjoying this. A
little bracing honesty can be a mood booster.
The next day, we get a visit from my wife's dad and
stepmom.
"Did you get the birthday gift I sent you?" asks her stepmom.
"Uh-huh," I say.
She
sent me a gift certificate to Saks Fifth Avenue.
"And? Did you like it?"
"Not really. I don't like
gift certificates. It's like you're giving me an errand to run."
"Well, uh . . ."
Once again, I felt
the thrill of inappropriate candor. And I felt something else, too. The paradoxical joy of being free from choice. I
had no choice but to tell the truth. I didn't have to rack my brain figuring out how to hedge it, spin it, massage
it.
"Just being honest," I shrug. Nice touch, I decide; helps take the edge off. She's got a thick skin.
She'll be okay. And I'll tell you this: I'll never get a damn gift certificate from her again.
I still
tell plenty of lies every day, but by the end of the week I've slashed the total by at least 40 percent. Still, the
giddiness is wearing off. A life of radical honesty is filled with a hundred confrontations every day. Small, but
they're relentless.
"Yes, I'll come to your office, but I resent you for making me travel."
"My boss
said I should invite you to this meeting, although it wouldn't have occurred to me to do so."
"I have
nothing else to say to you. I have run out of conversation."
My wife tells me a story about switching
operating systems on her computer. In the middle, I have to go help our son with something, then forget to come
back.
"Do you want to hear the end of the story or not?" she asks.
"Well...is there a
payoff?"
"#### you."
It would have been a lot easier to have kept my mouth closed and listened to her.
It reminds me of an issue I raised with Blanton: Why make waves? "Ninety percent of the time I love my wife," I told
him. "And 10 percent of the time I hate her. Why should I hurt her feelings that 10 percent of the time? Why not
just wait until that phase passes and I return to the true feeling, which is that I love her?"
Blanton's
response: "Because you're a manipulative, lying son of a #####."
Okay, he's right. It's manipulative and
patronizing to shut up and listen. But it's exhausting not to.
One other thing is also becoming apparent:
There's a fine line between radical honesty and creepiness. Or actually no line at all. It's simple logic: Men
think about sex every three minutes, as the scientists at Redbook remind us. If you speak whatever's on your mind,
you'll be talking about sex every three minutes.
I have a business breakfast with an editor from Rachael
Ray's magazine. As we're sitting together, I tell her that I remember what she wore the first time we met -- a
black shirt that revealed her shoulders in a provocative way. I say that I'd try to sleep with her if I were
single. I confess to her that I just attempted (unsuccessfully) to look down her shirt during breakfast.
She
smiles. Though I do notice she leans back farther in her seat.
The thing is, the separate cubbyholes of my
personality are merging. Usually, there's a professional self, a home self, a friend self, a with-the-guys self.
Now, it's one big improper mess. This woman and I have either taken a step forward in our relationship, or she'll
never return my calls again.
When I get home, I keep the momentum going. I call a friend to say that I
fantasize about his wife. (He says he likes my wife, too, and suggests a key party.)
I inform our
twenty-seven-year-old nanny that "if my wife left me, I would ask you out on a date, because I think you are
stunning."
She laughs. Nervously.
"I think that makes you uncomfortable, so I won't mention it again.
It was just on my mind."
Now I've made my own skin crawl. I feel like I should just buy a trench coat and
start lurking around subway platforms. Blanton says he doesn't believe sex talk in the workplace counts as sexual
harassment -- it's tight-assed society's fault if people can't handle the truth -- but my nanny confession just
feels like pure abuse of power.
All this lasciviousness might be more palatable if I were a single man. In
fact, I have a theory: I think Blanton devised Radical Honesty partly as a way to pick up women. It's a brilliant
strategy. The antithesis of mind games. Transparent mating.
And according to Blanton, it's effective. He
tells me about a woman he once met on a Paris subway and asked out for tea. When they sat down, he said, "I didn't
really want any tea; I was just trying to figure out a way to delay you so I could talk to you for a while, because
I want to go to bed with you." They went to bed together. Or another seduction technique of his: "Wanna
####?"
"That works?" I asked.
"Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, but it's the creation of
possibility."
I lied today. A retired man from New Hampshire -- a friend of a friend -- wrote some poems and
sent them to me. His wife just died, and he's taken up poetry. He just wanted someone in publishing to read his
work. A professional opinion.
I read them. I didn't like them much, but I wrote to him that I thought they
were very good.
So I e-mail Blanton for the first time since our meeting and confess what I did. I write,
"His wife just died, he doesn't have friends. He's kind of pathetic. I read his stuff, or skimmed it actually. I
didn't like it. I thought it was boring and badly written. So I e-mailed a lie. I said I really like the poems and
hope they get published. He wrote me back so excited and how it made his week and how he was about to give up on
them but my e-mail gave him the stamina to keep trying."
I ask Blanton whether I made a mistake.
He
responds curtly. I need to come to his eight-day workshop to "even begin to get what [Radical Honesty] is about." He
says we need to meet in person.
Meet in person? Did he toss down so many bourbons I vanished from his memory?
I tell him we did meet.
Blanton writes back testily that he remembers. But I still need to take a workshop
(price tag: $2,800). His only advice on my quandary: "Send the man the e-mail you sent me about lying to him and ask
him to call you when he gets it...and see what you learn."
Show him the e-mail? Are you kidding? What a
hardcore bastard.
In his book, Radical Honesty, Blanton advises us to start sentences with the words "I
resent you for" or "I appreciate you for." So I write him back.
"I resent you for being so different in these
e-mails than you were when we met. You were friendly and engaging and encouraging when we met. Now you seem to have
turned judgmental and tough. I resent you for giving me the advice to break that old man's heart by telling him
that his poems suck."
Blanton responds quickly. First, he doesn't like that I expressed my resentment by
e-mail. I should have come to see him. "What you don't seem to get yet, A.J., is that the reason for expressing
resentment directly and in person is so that you can experience in your body the sensations that occur when you
express the resentment, while at the same time being in the presence of the person you resent, and so you can stay
with them until the sensations arise and recede and then get back to neutral -- which is what forgiveness
is."
Second, he tells me that telling the old man the truth would be compassionate, showing the "authentic
caring underneath your usual intellectual bull#### and overvaluing of your critical judgment. Your lie is not useful
to him. In fact, it is simply avoiding your responsibility as one human being to another. That's okay. It happens
all the time. It is not a mortal sin. But don't bull#### yourself about it being kind."
He ends with this:
"I don't want to spend a lot of time explaining things to you for your cute little project of playing with telling
the truth if you don't have the balls to try it."
Condescending #####.
I know my e-mail to the old
man was wrong. I shouldn't have been so rah-rah effusive. But here, I've hit the outer limit of Radical Honesty, a
hard wall. I can't trash the old man.
I try to understand Blanton's point about compassion. To most of us,
honesty often means cruelty.
But to Blanton, honesty and compassion are the ones in sync. It's an intriguing
way to look at the world, but I just don't buy it in the case of the widower poet. Screw Blanton. (By the way: I
broke Radical Honesty and changed the identifying details of the old-man story so as not to humiliate him. Also,
I've messed a bit with the timeline of events to simplify things. Sorry.)
To compensate for my wimpiness, I
decide to toughen up. Which is probably the exact wrong thing to do. Today, I'm getting a haircut, and my barber is
telling me he doesn't want his wife to get pregnant because she'll get too fat (a bit of radical honesty of his
own), and I say, "You know, I'm tired. I have a cold. I don't want to talk anymore. I want to
read."
"Okay," he says, wielding his scissors, "go ahead and read."
Later, I do the same thing with my
in-laws when they're yapping on about preschools. "I'm bored," I announce. "I'll be back later." And with that, I
leave the living room.
I tell Blanton, hoping for his approval. Did anything come of it? he asks. Any
discussions and insights? Hmmm.
He's right. If you're going to be a schmuck, at least you should find some
redeeming quality in it. Blanton's a master of this. One of his tricks is to say things with such glee and
enthusiasm, it's hard to get too pissed. "You may be a petty #######," he says, "but at least you're not a secret
petty #######." Then he'll laugh.
I have yet to learn that trick myself. Consider how I handled this scene
at a diner a couple of blocks from my apartment.
"Everything okay?" asked our server, an Asian man with
tattoos.
"Yeah, except for the coffee. I always have to order espresso here, because the espresso tastes like
regular coffee. The regular coffee here is terrible. Can't you guys make stronger coffee?"
The waiter said
no and walked away. My friend looked at me. "I'm embarrassed for you," he said. "And I'm embarrassed to be around
you."
"I know. Me, too." I felt like a Hollywood producer who parks in handicapped spots. I ask Blanton what
I should have done.
"You should have said, 'This coffee tastes like ####!' " he says, cackling.
I
will say this: One of the best parts of Radical Honesty is that I'm saving a whole lot of time. It's a
cut-to-the-chase way to live. At work, I've been waiting for my boss to reply to a memo for ten days. So I write
him: "I'm annoyed that you didn't respond to our memo earlier. But at the same time, I'm relieved, because then
if we don't nail one of the things you want, we can blame any delays on your lack of response."
Pressing
send makes me nervous -- but the e-mail works. My boss responds: "I will endeavor to respond by tomorrow. Been gone
from N.Y. for two weeks." It is borderline apologetic. I can push my power with my boss further than I
thought.
Later, a friend of a friend wants to meet for a meal. I tell him I don't like leaving my house. "I
agree to meet some people for lunch because I fear hurting their feelings if I don't. And in this terrifying age
where everyone has a blog, I don't want to offend people, because then they'd write on their blogs what an #######
I am, and it would turn up in every Google search for the rest of my life."
He writes back: "Normally, I
don't really like meeting editors anyway. Makes me ill to think about it, because I'm afraid of coming off like
the idiot that, deep down, I suspect I am."
That's one thing I've noticed: When I am radically honest,
people become radically honest themselves. I feel my resentment fade away. I like this guy. We have a good
meeting.
In fact, all my relationships can take a whole lot more truth than I expected. Consider this one:
For years, I've had a chronic problem where I refer to my wife, Julie, by my sister's name, Beryl. I always catch
myself midway through and pretend it didn't happen. I've never confessed to Julie. Why should I? It either means
that I'm sexually attracted to my sister, which is not good. Or that I think of my wife as my sister, also not
good.
But today, in the kitchen, when I have my standard mental sister-wife mix-up, I decide to tell Julie
about it.
"That's strange," she says.
We talk about it. I feel unburdened, closer to my wife now that
we share this quirky, slightly disturbing knowledge. I realize that by keeping it secret, I had given it way too
much weight. I hope she feels the same way.
I call up Blanton one last time, to get his honest opinion about
how I've done.
"I'm finishing my experiment," I say.
"You going to start lying again?" he
asks.
"Hell yeah."
"Oh, ####. It didn't work."
"But I'm going to lie less than I did
before."
I tell him about my confession to Julie that I sometimes want to call her Beryl. "No big deal," says
Blanton. "People in other cultures have sex with their sisters all the time."
I bring up the episode about
telling the editor from Rachael Ray's magazine that I tried to look down her shirt, but he sounds disappointed.
"Did you tell your wife?" he asks. "That's the good part."
Finally, I describe to him how I told Julie that
I didn't care to hear the end of her story about fixing her computer. Blanton asks how she responded.
"She
said, '#### you.' "
"That's good!" Blanton says. "I like that. That's communicating."
Bookmarks