Perhaps you should contact me privately. Bob Moss onceOriginally Posted by Bubba
advised me "you know how it works; present it and write it up." That is, present first, so you get feedback from
peers--before--they tell you what you forgot or didn't know. I presented at the Association for Chemoreception
Sciences, and received nothing but validation for the entire model (circa 2000). I'm sure I could find the
abstract--as they are always published in "Chemical Senses." If others are holding back, I've not seen this. In
fact, I usually get pre-publication copies of what's forthcoming. Once presentation occurs, "everyone" knows where
the work originated--except media reps, of course. The academics I know could care less about getting media credit.
Originally Posted by BubbaHow might a 57-page review article fit into Feynman'sOriginally Posted by Bubba
perspective? Might that be enough information to allow others to judge the value of my contribution. Have you read
it? Has anyone on this Forum read it? Or should we consider only what's available directly in this Pheromone Forum,
and judge from that?
JVK
The Scent of Eros
Bookmarks