Quote Originally Posted by Bubba
...your ego seems to be preventing you from grasping my point…
…your ego seems to be preventing

you from seeing clearly.
… it is not relevant to my criticism of your posturing in this forum.
…you are

missing the point completely.
…You have been embarrassed by my criticism,…
…. Again, you seem to be

desperately trying to shift attention away from your behavior in this forum, which is my issue with you (and I

believe DST's and Belgareth's as well).
…Again, your attempt to assert authority supports the hypothesis that

you're more interested in being right than you are in learning the truth.
I've been through

this before, both with "strangers" to the Forum and more established Forum participants, and
1) think you have

made clear (in the excerpts above) the fact that MY ego is not the problem;
2) will not waste anymore of my time

discussing authority or truth with someone who isn't even interested in an attempt to read or understand my latest

peer-reviewed journal article.

Quote Originally Posted by Bubba
I'm very interested in why you would title a post about a

single paper "MOS not VNO+AOS processing of pheromones"
Many of my posts regarding the VNO debate

were deleted, and I was told after-the-fact to keep the topic in the Pheromone Research section. If you are

interested in comparing recent published information on the human VNO+AOS (or other) processing (since humans do not

have an AOS) of pheromones, please start a new thread there.

James V. Kohl
The Mind's Eyes: Human

Pheromones, Neuroscience, and Male Sexual Preferences