Close

Results 1 to 30 of 35

Thread: Androstanone?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Banned User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    109
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    AndrostAnone

    was hypothesized to be more biologically active at the human female VNO versus androstenone, due to structure

    activity relationship observations.

    I do know that androstAnone is a component in - my analysis of the

    mix did prove this much. Quantitative analysis not performed.
    Last edited by Archetypical Hybrid (HEC); 11-07-2006 at 05:20 PM.

  2. #2
    Phero Pro
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    878
    Rep Power
    7282

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Archetypical Hybrid

    (HEC)
    AndrostAnone was hypothesized to be more biologically active at the human female VNO versus androstenone, due

    to structure activitiy relationship observations.
    VNO is a non functioning organ, therefore I

    believe that the hypothsis you mentioned above is incorrect.

  3. #3
    Banned User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    109
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    VNO is a

    non functioning organ, therefore I believe that the hypothsis you mentioned above is incorrect


    Au

    Contraire!
    I'd like to see your evidence bronzi boy.. While the VNO is less of a driving force in higher

    mammels (such as are we) it nontheless influences behavior - this is common knowledge.

    There is also the fact

    that physiological reaction (behavior) to a vomeropherin (such as in Androstadienone [or A1]) strongly correlates

    its activity at the VNO. Same story with Estratetraenol.

    AndrostAnone is known to evoke a

    stronger response in the human female VNO then does androstenone (thus proving my original theory correct).

    See

    for yourself:


    AndrostAnone is the first bar

    shown
    (5
    α-androstan-3-one)


    Androstenone (-none) is the

    forth one listed
    (5α-androst-16-en-3-one)



    Androstadienone is the fifth one listed

    (androsta-4,16-en-3-one)




    P.S. There is also

    the fact that androstAnone is far more volatile than androstenone. AndrostAnone's MP is 103˚C,

    whereas androstenone's MP is 145˚C (according to the Sigma-Aldrich catalog). Thus, the vapor

    pressure is higher and hence it evaporates into the air (where pheromones are active) much moreso than

    androstenone.
    Last edited by Archetypical Hybrid (HEC); 11-07-2006 at 05:44 PM.

  4. #4
    Stranger Andras's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    14
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by P.S. There is also the

    fact that androstAnone is far more volatile than androstenone. AndrostAnone's MP is 103[SIZE=5
    ˚[/SIZE]C,

    whereas androstenone's MP is 145˚C (according to the Sigma-Aldrich catalog). Thus, the vapor

    pressure is higher and hence it evaporates into the air (where pheromones are active) much moreso than

    androstenone.
    I think you mean... basically, it's going to shoot out of you a lot faster and

    hence more direct/radialogically (aura). very good P.S. since the reactions are making sense to the point.

  5. #5
    Stranger
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Archetypical Hybrid

    (HEC)
    P.S. There is also the fact that androstAnone is far more volatile than androstenone. AndrostAnone's MP is

    103žC, whereas androstenone's MP is 145žC (according to the Sigma-Aldrich catalog).

    Thus, the vapor pressure is higher and hence it evaporates into the air (where pheromones are active) much moreso

    than androstenone.
    I can't find it in the catalog under either 5-ALPHA-ANDROSTAN-3-ONE or

    androstanone. What is the catalog number?

  6. #6
    Banned User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    109
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    It was an old

    catalog - Sigma has discontinued androstanone. There are currently only two suppliers worldwide for the

    raw-material.

  7. #7
    Banned User jvkohl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Northern Georgia
    Posts
    1,127
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Archetypical Hybrid

    (HEC)
    AndrostAnone was hypothesized to be more biologically active at the human female VNO versus androstenone, due

    to structure activity relationship observations.
    "...there is now overwhelming evidence that the

    vomeronasal organ (VNO) is not functional in human adults (Wysocki and Preti 2004)."
    Quoted from: Penn, D. (2006)

    Chemical Communication.

    JVK


  8. #8
    Banned User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    109
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    You're wrong

    JVK, and so are Wysocki and Preti

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. New Product *beta test*
    By Bruce in forum Pheromone Discussion
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 07-23-2006, 08:43 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •